Explain this a little bit clearer now. Thank You!

I can read it Levi. I have a lot of practice reading old court opinions of judges who fell in love with their dictionary.

1. Levi's mom took his car to work.
2. Levi's mom expected him to detail her car, which was at home. (The facts do not state whether Levi, in fact, detailed her car for her. Hence, he might be a bad son.)
3. Levi, in an attempt to play a practical joke on his mom, called her and stated that his car, which she drove to work, was stolen. (I assume that Levi meant for her to think the car was stolen from home)
4. Levi's mom (who might have it going on), not realizing that she drove his car to work, called the police to report his car stolen.
5. A policeman came to Levi's home to investigate Levi's mom's allegation, and Levi shit a brick and panicked, took the easy way out, and told the officer it was a mistake on his mom's part. (What a great fucking son you are)
6. Later that day, Levi's mom realized what happened, and called him to ground him and take away his computer rights.